【KL MAMAK档暴动事件】11男怒砸餐馆伤人!#zh

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Screenshot-2021-03-01-at-4.28.45-PM-1024x975.png

案发时间:2021年2月28日星期日),晚上9时30分
案发地点:十五碑敦善班登路,吉隆坡

昨晚网上开始疯传一组餐馆暴动的照片与视频。可见数名男子对服务员大吼大叫,甚至开始向服务员扔东西。案发经过一一被民众摄下,并上传到社交媒体。

事件发生在昨晚9时30分左右。由于行动管制令的SOP只限餐馆营业至晚间10时,所以服务员拒绝了登门的11名印裔男子的用餐要求。

疑因不满无法在餐厅用餐,这11名男子开始大发雷霆怒砸店面及大吼。他们甚至向服务员摔桌椅,食客们也无一幸免,通通遭殃!

吉隆坡总警长拿督赛夫在接受访问时,证实确有此案。警方在接获投报后,即刻展开调查,并在今日凌晨1时,成功逮捕其中3名男子归案。

“警方已援引刑事法典第148 (持械暴动)条文对事件展开调查。目前仍在追查其余8名涉案男子的下落。”

据悉有几名服务员蒙受轻伤,但所幸无人受重伤。在此温馨提醒大家,请尽可能提早用餐时间,也不要将怒气发泄在他人身上哦~


如您是文中视频或照片的原创者,请WhatsApp 011-5645 2815与我们联系以取得报酬。

看到有趣的事情发生? 向我们发送视频或照片,可获得高达RM500的现金报酬! 浏览www.lokalwav.com 以了解更多详情。

Riot breaks out at restaurant in KL, 11 men involved

Incident Date: 9:30 PM, Sunday, 28 February 2021
Location: Jalan Tun Sambanthan, Kuala Lumpur

Photos and videos of a group of men rioting and causing havoc in front of a restaurant began circulating on social media last night. It showed several men throwing objects and shouting at the restaurant staff while bystanders stood around watching.

The story goes that 11 men showed up to the restaurant at 9:30 p.m., hoping to catch a late night snack. Unfortunately, current SOPs only allow eateries to open up till 10 p.m. and as such, the restaurant staff conveyed the message that they were no longer serving food.

However, it is believed that the group of men were unhappy that they were turned away by the restaurant, so they started harassing the restaurant staff. A scuffle then broke out between the two parties, but not long after, as seen in the videos above, they began throwing tables and chairs at not only the staff, but the eatery itself. Chaos ensued and havoc was wrecked around the restaurant in general.

Bystanders were quick to alert authorities, and as reported by Harian Metro, police have arrested 3 out of 11 individuals that were involved in the fight.

Kuala Lumpur Chief of Police Datuk Saiful Azly Kamaruddin said the three suspects were arrested through an operation at 1am.

Datuk Saiful also added that the  authorities are tracking down the 8 other individuals involved for investigation according to Section 147 of the Penal Code, for rioting without weapons.

Thankfully, it seems that the restaurant staff were able to avoid any major injuries. Here’s a reminder to dine a little earlier if possible, and to not take your frustrations out on food service workers, or anyone for that matter!


Are you the original owner of any media found within this article? Do reach out to us via WhatsApp at 011-5645 2815 for compensation.

See anything interesting? Send us video clips or images of it and get paid up to RM500! Visit www.lokalwav.com to find out more.

COMMENT | In shock and awe over facts and figures

Miliki 'Sugar Baby' Serendah RM400 - Semasa | mStar

The founder of the Sugarbook application was charged in the Magistrate’s Court on Feb 24 with ‘publishing statements conducive to public mischief’ on social media on Feb 10.

Information technology entrepreneur, 34-year-old Chan Eu Boon, was charged with intent to cause fear or alarm to the public or any section of the public that any person may be induced to commit an offence against public order through such publication.

I do not want to discuss the merits of the case lest I am cited for contempt under the sub judice rule but many Malaysians would have come across many statements on social media that are ‘conducive to public mischief’.

But this subjective test of causing ‘fear and alarm’ compelled me to think aloud. Who decides if a statement causes fear? Usually, the ‘reasonable man’ test is applied but I am still asking myself whether an arrest is necessary, especially for a non-seizable offence.

Weren’t Najib Abdul Razak’s supporters alarmed when the Pakatan Harapan’s presidential council stated that the verdict in the SRC trial was a “big victory” for Malaysians? Many had expressly said so.

Would I be subjected to Section 505 of the Penal Code if I publish results of a survey by Pornhub, an online adult site?

In a 2015 report on its website on statistics of its users’ habits, it said Internet users in Kuala Terengganu were the top pornography streamers in the country, spending an average of 12 minutes and 58 seconds per visit while Kuala Lumpur came in second (12:29) followed by Kota Bahru and Miri (12:27) per visit in third place. Would these statistics amount to causing alarm?

What if I added spice to the story by including the online porn viewing preferences of Malaysians in general:

Malaysians prefer boobs over butts;

Malaysia ranks in eighth place for porn searches involving the word ‘pregnant’;

Malaysians spend amongst the most time online (12:05 minutes on average) when watching porn in the region;

The top 10 search terms in Malaysia are Malay, Malaysia, Japanese, Malaysian, Asian, Malaysia, Malay gay, rape, massage, Japan.
Aren’t these figures more alarming than the list of sugar babies and sugar daddies in Malaysia?

Were you alarmed?

Would I get into trouble if I quote the Archives of Sexual Behaviour which states: “In heavily religious states, abstinence is often pushed as the only safe sex, with very little to offer in the way of sexual education. Unfortunately, that leaves a growing number of people with questions about sex but no answers. So, of course, the study finds that religious communities have a higher percentage of sex-related searches. That’s what happens when you can’t find it elsewhere.

“Would I be asking for trouble if I quote a media report which correlates with the situation in Malaysia? The report says Kuala Terengganu and Kota Baru, located in the east coast states known for religious conservatism, were at the top three spots for Pornhub’s 2014 statistics which compiled data on the average amount of time Malaysians spent on its site.

This is an exercise in thinking aloud about what constitutes fear or alarm. Were you alarmed by these statistics? Would you be induced to commit an offence against public order after reading them?

Would you be alarmed if someone who has been convicted and yet goes on a roadshow to proclaim his innocence by swearing on the holy book? Are you shocked if a convicted felon speaks like the leader of the opposition?

Wouldn’t anyone be alarmed when the present cabinet of ministers is described consistently as the “backdoor government” or Muhyiddin Yassin being described as a “backdoor prime minister”?

Therefore, I am still thinking aloud as to who would fear and who is alarmed when facts and figures, statistics and other scientific findings are published.

We know for a fact that some of our MPs are alarmed when statistics on child marriages are announced in the Dewan Rakyat. A handful fears that their religious freedom is being trampled and hence get incensed when the subject is debated.

When an older man marries a 12-year-old he is treated like a celebrity. The neighbourhood comes to bless the couple and the media in interviews asked about his virility.

Shouldn’t that cause alarm, to say the least?

More than ten years ago, Amir Muhammed compiled Malaysian Politicians Say the Darndest Things. He described it as further proof that “we don’t need to travel far to experience shock and awe”.

He wrote: “Some of the quotes are witty and pithy, others are weird and prickly, and still others are just out-of-tune. If all History lessons were this painless, none of us would have ever skipped classes.

“Many a politician would have been in shock and awe if they had read their infamous quotes, but do they read?”

*Views expressed here are the writer’s own.